I’m reading Glasses.net (Loved the original design, this new layout is equally excellent). Here is an interesting entry on Wintu: Wintu-2.
The Wintu language was spoken in Northern California by the Native Americans. They were distributed along the upper Sacramento river, in the counties of Shasta, Trinity and Siskiyou.
Some interesting quotes used in the article:
among the Wintu¡ the principle of inviolate integrity of the individual is basic to the very morphology of the language. Many of the verbs which express coercion in our language ¨C such as to take the baby to (the shade) or to change the baby ¨C are formed in such a way that they express cooperative effort instead. For example, the Wintu would say, ¡°I went with the baby¡±, instead of, ¡°I took the baby¡±. [..] They never say, and in fact they cannot say, as we do, ¡°I have a sister¡±, or a ¡°son¡±, or ¡°husband¡±. Instead they say, ¡°I am sistered¡±, or ¡°I live with my sister¡±. To live with is the usual way in which they express what we call posession, and they use this term for everything they respect, so that a man will be said to live with his bow and arrows**
Interesting, isn’t it? They show so much more respect for their surroundings. Self must reorient according to the land. How about their indifference for possession? It is almost moving to read this. But there are only 6-10 Wintu speakers left in the entire US! 🙁 If “the fittest survive” is true, that shows “love for the environment and all men are equal” won’t prevent you from being conquered and absorbed by a “lesser” culture (lesser in the sense of being civilized). More over, the “lesser” culture thought people spoken such a language was barbaric.